Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyala, M.D. (María Dolores)
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Saorín, A.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Torres, H.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Alcázar, A. (Alicia) 
dc.contributor.authorArizcun-Arizcun, M. (Marta) 
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T20:56:49Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T20:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0372-5480
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.24099/vet.arhiv.0319
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10508/15568
dc.description.abstractSparus aurata specimens of 11 months of age (mean weight: 90.2 g, mean length: 18.3 cm) were classified in two diet groups: one control group was fed with conventional diet, and one experimental group was fed with an organic diet. The body and muscle parameters were studied at 0, 41 and 71 days of the experiment. The results showed the highest values of body length and weight as well as the best biological feed conversion rates in the organic group. The transverse area of white muscle, the hyperplasia and the muscle fibres density were also higher in the organic than in the conventional group (P>0.05). In contrast, hypertrophy was greater in the conventional than in the organic group (P<0.05). Survival was 100% in both groups. In conclusion, the organic feeding regime was more favourable for growth than conventional feeding.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagrebes_ES
dc.subjectSparus aurataen
dc.subjectorganic dieten
dc.subjectbody growthen
dc.subjectwhite muscleen
dc.subjectmuscle cellularityen
dc.titleThe influence of the organic versus conventional feeding on the growth and survival of gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata L. juveniles.es_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.publisher.centreCentro Oceanográfico de Murcia
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.identifier.doi10.24099/vet.arhiv.0319


Files in this item

untranslated

    Show simple item record