OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories
Share
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthors
Perakakis, P. (Pandelis); Ponsati, A. (Agnes); Bernal, I. (Isabel); Sierra, C. (Carles); Osman, N. (Nardine); Mosquera-de-Arancibia, C. (Concha); Lorenzo, E. (Emilio)Editor's version
http://journal.code4lib.org/issues/issues/issue35Date
2017-01-30Type
articleKeywords
Open Peer ReviewOpen Access Repositories
Metrics
Reputation
DSpace
e-IEO
DIGITAL.CSIC
Open Scholar CIC
IIIA-CSIC
Arvo Consultores y Tecnología
Revisión por Pares en Abierto
Repositorios de Acceso Abierto
Métricas
Reputación
Abstract
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts in the field providing comments for a submitted article. The reviewer remains anonymous to the author, with only the editor knowing the reviewer´s identity. This model is now being challenged and open peer review (OPR) models are viewed as the new frontier of the review process. OPR is a term that encompasses diverse variations in the traditional review process. Examples of this are modifications in the way in which authors and reviewers are aware of each other’s identity (open identities), the visibility of the reviews carried out (open reviews) or the opening up of the review to the academic community (open participation). We present the project for the implementation of an Open Peer Review Module in two major Spanish repositories, DIGITAL.CSIC and e-IEO, together with some promising initial results and challenges in the take-up process. The OPR module, designed for integration with ...
The following license files are associated with this item: