Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRomán, A. (Adán)
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo, E. (Emilio)
dc.contributor.authorMosquera-de-Arancibia, C. (Concha) 
dc.contributor.authorBernal, I. (Isabel)
dc.contributor.authorSierra, C. (Carles)
dc.contributor.authorOsman, N. (Nardine)
dc.contributor.authorPerakakis, P. (Pandelis)
dc.contributor.authorPonsati, A. (Agnès)
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-30T11:56:12Z
dc.date.available2016-09-30T11:56:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10508/10559
dc.description.abstractOne important element missing from open access repositories is a quantitative assessment of the hosted research items that will facilitate the process of selecting the most relevant and distinguished content. Common currently available metrics, such as number of visits and downloads, do not reflect the quality of a research product, which can only be assessed directly by peers offering their expert opinion together with quantitative ratings based on specific criteria. To address the aforementioned situation, the open peer review module, OPRM, can be installed to existing Dspace institutional or other repositories and offered as an overlay service. Digital research works hosted in these repositories could then be evaluated by an unlimited number of peers that would offer not only a qualitative assessment in the form of text, but also quantitative measures that will be used to build the work’s reputation. Importantly, this evaluation system will be open and transparent. By open we mean that the full text of the peer reviews will be publicly available along with the original research work. By transparent we mean that the identity of the reviewers will be disclosed to the authors and to the public. In our model, openness and transparency are two elemental aspects we consider necessary to address the issue of biased or non-expert opinions, which is inherent in the anonymous peer review model, characterized by the unaccountability of reviewers. Important to notice, OPRM includes a reviewer reputation system based on the assessment of reviews themselves by other peer reviewers. This allows a sophisticated scaling of the importance of each review on the overall assessment of a research work, based on the reputation of the revieweres_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipOpenAIREes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relationSoftwarees_ES
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://hdl.handle.net/10508/9990es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceAn Open Peer Review Module for Open Access Repositorieses_ES
dc.subjectOpen Peer Reviewes_ES
dc.subjectOpen Repositorieses_ES
dc.subjectMetricses_ES
dc.subjectReputationes_ES
dc.subjectDSpacees_ES
dc.subjecte-IEOes_ES
dc.subjectDIGITAL.CSICes_ES
dc.subjectOpen Scholar CICes_ES
dc.subjectIIIA-CSICes_ES
dc.subjectArvo Consultores y Tecnologíaes_ES
dc.subjectRevisión por pares en abiertoes_ES
dc.subjectRepositorios de acceso abiertoes_ES
dc.subjectMétricases_ES
dc.subjectReputaciónes_ES
dc.subjectOpen systemses_ES
dc.subjectOPRM Consortiumes_ES
dc.subjectOpenAIREes_ES
dc.titleOpen Peer Review Module (OPRM). Softwarees_ES
dc.typesoftwarees_ES
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationDSpace. -. 2016. 2016-03*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://github.com/arvoConsultores/Open-Peer-Review-Module/wikies_ES
dc.publisher.centreSede Central IEOes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/643410es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subject.asfaOpen access resourceses_ES
dc.subject.asfaopen systems


Files in this item

    Show simple item record

    Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
    Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España